Setting apart electronic music
Music, Rants October 27th. 2007, 8:34pm
As a fan of electronic music, particularly trance/vocal-trance, there is something rather annoying that I would like to make clear to those who don’t understand. It’s the fact that songs are ignorantly referred to as “techno music” as long as they have any apparent synthesizers or electronic motifs in them (This is usually followed by me putting my hand over my face in disgust and saying “Good crap!”).
Some people know better, but as for those who lack a decent knowledge of modern music - whom are way too many - the error is rampant. Let me regurgitate and simplify a common, but incorrect definition of what techno really is:
Techno is music that consists of electronic instrumentation.
I could elaborate further on this, but this is the basic and general definition of techno music. It’s also very wrong.
Allow me to cut the crap and clarify the difference between electronic music, techno, and any other terms that may incorrectly describe the same thing. If you look it up on the all-knowing Wikipedia, you get a nice summary of electronica today (which is different from techno):
Electronic music refers to music that emphasizes the use of electronic musical instruments or electronic music technology as a central aspect of the sound of the music. Historically electronic music was considered to be any music created with the use of electronic musical instruments or electronic processing, but in modern times, that distinction has been lost because almost all recorded music today, and the majority of live music performances, depends on extensive use of electronics. Today, the term electronic music serves to differentiate music that uses electronics as its focal point or inspiration, from music that uses electronics mainly in service of creating an intended production that may have some electronic elements in the sound but does not focus upon them.
I thought it was necessary to include that last part, because it’s important to know that almost all professional music today is made with some type of electronic equipment or synthesizer (including movie soundtracks, kid stuff, and much more). It’s obviously wrong to call orchestral background music “electronic” simply because it was produced in a computer. It’s just more practical to create it digitally than having a dozen people holding an instrument; that’s all.
If you are now dumbfounded and wondering what “techno” really is, it’s a form of electronic dance music that began a few decades ago in western Europe. This is one of the many subgenres of electronica, some being very specific as well as more obscure. These may include “acid“, “drill ‘n’ bass“, and several others. I, myself, am personally fond of vocal trance.
So there you have it. The thumbnail image accompanying this post is from the music video of “DotA” by Basshunter, which can be viewed here (Thanks, Levi).
October 27th, 2007 at 10:55 pm
Yeah… a few years ago, a friend of mine suggested I listen to The Postal Service, since they knew I like electronica/”techno” music.
Uh… the Postal Service is NOT techno. It’s some idiot pop-music wannabes who found a synth in their dad’s basement. Or found an old keyboard with an auto-play function.
October 29th, 2007 at 2:53 am
Oh, I’d edit if I could…
But having your navigation on the left is weird… and idk it’s a strain. Since we read from left to right, having that gap on the left is ‘hard on the eyes’ and isn’t good for your brain.
More complex and there was this huge explanation… Something we learned in Business Web Design yesterday.
Which btw, the class is retarded. The teacher doesn’t know anything and we’re STILL ON HTML.
– Steel Froggy
P.S. I just realized my coolio arrow didn’t work.
All well, you get the point.
October 29th, 2007 at 11:44 am
Me, Chase, Chris, and AJ found DotA way before you guys! lol thats ok though!
October 29th, 2007 at 12:36 pm
@Lauren: Wait a minute.. I didn’t realize this was a race to see who finds the song first…?
@Levi: It’s World of Warcraft! Now where’s my cookies?
October 29th, 2007 at 9:27 pm
WRONG!
It’s Warcraft III!
NOW I GET COOKIES! Oh wait, I already had them. *gives cookies to self*
October 30th, 2007 at 10:29 am
Course it’s a race! Finding good music is always a race… you of all people should know…;)
October 30th, 2007 at 10:31 am
Do you think that guy looks a little like Levi?
October 30th, 2007 at 11:08 pm
The junk you mention that is true techno isnt real techno. Real techno is Underworld, Paul Oakenfold, Kraftwerk and other grassroots techno artists.
By the way, the first techno was introduced by the introduction of the tape looping effect. It was introduced by Karlheinz Stockhausen. It then was used by The Beatles on their revolver album, only to be followed by the perfection of the synth by Pink Floyd.
If you’re wanting to get technical, I am just letting you know that you better check your facts.
October 31st, 2007 at 7:07 am
Oops, you’re right, technoman. Wikipedia is so horribly inaccurate and stupid, so I really shouldn’t use it. In fact, why don’t you just completely disregard everything I said earlier about the definitions? Thanks man.
November 1st, 2007 at 12:52 pm
Instead of bagging me a douche sack, just get the info straight.
Getting a little defensive are we? Maybe because if you check up on the history, you may actually know that techno isnt nearly as new and amazing as you made it out to be.
Grant me the douche sack. At least it will be a correct douche sack…I will take being that over being childish.
I just stumbled across your blog by searching “techno”. Interestingly though, I just get called a douche for being correct and not necessarily agreeing with you. Kinda immature if you ask me.
Suggestion though, want an actual techno track? Look up any of the songs on Pink Floyd’s “Dark Side of the Moon” album or the tracks on The Beatles “Revolver”
November 1st, 2007 at 2:43 pm
Well, sorry if I seem childish, but one thing I would like to clarify is that I never referred to any techno song in particular. You’re giving me some examples of techno music as if I incorrectly labeled anything as techno in the first place.
Just a heads up if this is the case.
November 2nd, 2007 at 11:54 am
haha, gotta love the Douche sack.